Still, these numbers are illustrative of the real issue Nikon has been juggling. Unfortunately, they mix Nikon 1 in with DSLRs, and don’t call out DX versus FX. Here at the mid-point, it makes sense to look at Nikon’s own published numbers.
#Rub adobe creative cloud photography plan series
What Were Nikon’s Reported Numbers? This week I’ve been rolling out a series of charts to illustrate where Nikon is in the DSLR game. Next week we’ll jump to something entirely different, lens reviews. I’ll be wrapping up the “where Nikon is” series I’ve been doing this week tomorrow. I’ve added a Canon 80D and Nikon D7200 comparison table to the Canon versus Nikon page. This time around, I’m going to tackle the “prosumer" models, starting with the ones with the three digits after the D. This is the fourth in my series of analysis of a set of numbers for Nikon DSLR sales (previously: overall volume, DX vs FX, Nikon’s own numbers). Other Reasons I Thought the D500 Would Do Well. While, yes, there has been some lower volume in a few cases, some of that has to do with price increases as much as anything systemic in the market. Overall, it doesn’t seem like Nikon’s biggest problems are at the higher end of their DSLR lineup. I’d like to tackle a few of them directly. Article on īuzz, Buzz, DX Lenses. I' ve been watching all kinds of unsupported arguments derive from what I’ve written so far this week. They might not always seem to fully agree with what you’ve read on other sites. I’m about to pop out a bunch of new lens reviews. Thus, what happens is that one person’s “sharpness” is another person’s “unsharp,” and vice versa. I’m not aware that anyone has actually managed to clearly define the term, though. What is Sharpness? I see this term used all the time in comments about lenses and digital cameras. Tamron today announced a pair of new moderate telephoto primes. Today they surprised a lot of people by getting back into the crop sensor telephoto range in an interesting and exciting way: the 50-100mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art lens. II guess Sigma’s been reading my complaint about lack of DX lenses. In doing so, Nikon is playing catch up with Canon (1” GX models) and Sony (1” RX models) simultaneously it appears, though Nikon has managed to do one interesting thing we haven’t seen before. Nikon today announced a trio of compact cameras with 1” sensors, all under the DL name. With the introduction today of the three DL models, Nikon has effectively taken all that they accomplished in the Nikon 1 space in terms of camera and put that into compact cameras with fixed lenses. Sigma today joined the mirrorless camera ranks with the sd Quattro and sd Quattro H cameras, both of which show off many of Sigma’s historical camera idiosyncratic tendencies. Sigma announced a new 30mm f/1.4 lens for the Sony E (APS-C) mount, providing another fast “normal” lens option for people using cameras such as the Sony A6000 or A6300. Two More Mirrorless Lenses Announced. Panasonic announced a new 24-120mm equivalent lens that matches up nicely with cameras like the GX8: the 12-60mm f/3.5-5.6 Power OIS. With thousands of responses, here’s what you said. Nikon Went DL, Will You? As you know, I included two short poll questions with the article I wrote on the Nikon DL introductions. Now the reason why I mention that is that not a soul in the world would claim that the Sony E-mount kit lens is very good at “micro contrast.” Let alone micro contrast at the bottom of the frame (edge of lens coverage). What is Micro Contrast? The camera that was used is a Sony NEX-5 with the kit lens at 18mm. Now that the DLs have been announced-earlier than I expected, though they won’t be available to customers for quite a while-I can be clearer. I sort of foreshadowed the DL introduction with my earlier article on what Nikon needed to do to fix the Nikon 1 line.
What Any New Nikon 1 Would Have to Be Today. The One-Bag Photographic World Traveler.Day 7: Goodbye Landscapes, Hello Animals.
0 kommentar(er)
